Colregs violation

As master of the ship, I was keeping the 08.00 to I2.00 watch on a clear day, steering 053oT; speed 15 knots. I observed by radar, a crossing target (later seen to be container vessel) on my port bow, bearing approx 020 T' distance 12 miles, on a collision course. There was no other vessel in the vicinity and the other vessel's identity was verified on the AIS.

I watched as the other vessel continued to approach, still on a collision course. When she was about 3.5 miles off, and was taking no avoiding action, I called her on VHFl6. When I received a response to my second call, I asked for the container vessel's intention. The officer's reply was for me to keep clear as he did not want to carry out a large alteration of course, of about 50 degrees. I advised him that under the Colregs it was his duty to keep clear. The officer instantly became abusive and 'ordered' me to keep out of his way. I reminded him that we were on VHF 16. He then agreed to alter course. After altering, the officer of the container vessel advised me in a very haughty voice that he was the master I would have thought the master of a ship would be more likely to follow the Rules. I advised him that 1, too, was the master of my vessel. After passing clear, the master (?) of the container actions. I am afraid that this sort of reaction from so-called certificated officers is becoming far too common.

To read the full article, click here...
To read the ePaper, visit: http://www.eshippingtoday.com